Bluecaterpillar
2005-09-15, 22:20
WEEK 1
Well, fellow league members, I am back for the 3rd yearly edition of a weekly column… that will probably not remain weekly too long, because my schedule is just too loaded, but at least I am always starting with the best intentions in the Fantasy World.
This league is kicking its 3rd championship season, but with a total of 50% new owners over the first 2 seasons, only few long term rivalries have been able to develop.
I guess my #1 message is to wish everybody a wonderful season, fun and enjoyable.
However, my true wish is that most of you will decide to stick around for a lot longer than your previous owners and that we will really be able to enjoy a solid, long-term group.
Talking about rivalries… We have a nice one coming this week: the wannabe champs but ever-dwelling in the swamps, the green trolls of EFS 1002, the murkiest trader Fantasy has ever known: “the Swamp Dwellers” vs. your revered, all-mighty yet incredibly humble, the ever pleased with themselves (not playing with themselves), the 2004 World Champions (well, 1002 World Champions): “The Aquablues”.
Yep, week 2 and it’s already Him vs. Me.
I see that during the offseason, He has managed to con all the newbies into trading their best players for mirages of good players; He has managed to con all the newbies into getting Him out of Cap Hell. His greed knows no limit. He wants a 1002 title, then another one, then again. He will trade his mother for such a prize. So is the “Swamp Master”.
Luckily for all of you, Crazy Canucks fended him off in 2003… then yours truly, the Aquablues, playing with themselves, fended him off again. And again.
How is the pain, Mr. Swamp? I mean, a spanking during the regular season and then during playoffs.
Enough taunting.
The team to beat in 2005 clearly is the Swamps… Already a powerhouse, always drafting well, always trading extremely well, this is a beauty of team and my nightmare. A 2004 485 ppg nightmare……………
Enough taunting, I said.
Well, not quite… We can change victim, can’t we?
How about a small taunt towards Mr. Crazy “Teflon” Canuck?
I mean, I have been predicting his doom and fall and misery since week 1, season 1… What gave? The 2003 title.
Then, in 2004, I wrote: this time, he’s crumbling. He’s imploding. He will be miserable. What gave? 16-2 season (though yours truly took great, great pride in being responsible of 50% of those losses… To me, back then, it was as pleasurable as winning the title).
So what about 2005? Can Crazy “Teflon” Canuck pull another one?
Surely not would be my normal answer but I am sick of taking beatings on my predictions… so yes, I am guessing the Crazy Canucks will crumble into oblivion – but surely not…….. !!!!!!!!!!
Anyway… That’s how things shape up.
How about a quick hit on each team? Ready?
Team 1, Grandstand:
I never saw any real knock on this solid, young team – aside from drafting Charles Rogers!!
No, wait, this was a cheap shot: the kid has finally managed to play 1 game!!! And score? Yes, 5 whole points. How’s that for performance?
Otherwise, Grandstand team is solid and probably better than last year. 10-8 seems in order.
Team 2, No Fear:
An another Aussie in my league… I seem to be collecting them!! As a matter of fact, if I recall correctly, we originally had an Aussie in the league, back in 2003? Anyway.
This team had a very solid 2004 season, so can it repeat?
The DEF is under whelming and the secondary needs life support.
There is life in the OFF, but counting on the Drews to win the big one? I am not sure that’s possible. 10-8 would be nice.
Team 3, Aquablues:
Let’s cut the crap: I won many games last year thanks to Reuben Droughns playing (well) alongside Corey Dillon (playing well). So can I repeat? Considering I never thought I could win it in the first place?
I had to make serious cuts in the offseason for mildly aging players. I like my 3-4 as much as anybody’s – save Swampies, of course. My OL is yummy if Manning and Culpepper can dotheir magic. I have a huge issue at RB and it has plagued me since 2003… Bush will be mine in 2006!!!
So what gives? The team is slightly improved (in my loving eyes) over 2004 but not enough to be more than 12-6 – just like last year. Especially without Droughns.
Team 4, Darkspire Highlanders:
Talk about a rough transition… From playoffs and 10-8 to 5-13 and 15th in the league. Ouch.
The OFF juice is here to bring the form back, but the DEF mojo is lacking: I like the OB, but there is no ILBs on this team. So it’s reduced to playing a 4-3 and that DL is iffy at best.
Overall, it seems that real life has taken a huge toll on Ian’s Fantasy management and his DEF needs repair and good UFA work. Otherwise, it’s going to be a long, painful season. A 6-12 season – thanks to that OFF and OLBs.
Team 5, Crazy “Teflon” Canucks:
What can I say? It’s old, it’s bald, it’s supposed to lose, it’s doomed and it’s 16-2…
Joke aside, the DL is a blue collar dream. Opposed in style to the flashy names recruited by Swampies, Canucks went for less profile but hard work nonetheless. Who would have thought Pat Williams would score like Freeney??
The LB corps completes an aging DEF but one made of studs. This 4-3 or 3-4 has carried many wins. The OFF is very impressive, too.
Yes, you understand well: I am now converted. I am a believer. I think the Canucks are for real. 15-3 real.
I just hope this change of appreciation will jinx them forever and ever!!!!
Team 6, Reading Redskins:
This team was one of last year’s most improved… From 5-13 and last to middle of the pack, its only issue is to face the Canucks twice a year! Still, the work put in there has to be appreciated and the improvement was noticeable. So what’s in store?
It has a decent DEF – LeMar Marshall could have been the steal of the year at ILB – though the OB corps is on the weak side of weakness.
But really, deep down, the biggest knock on this team is its receiving corps. Or lack of.
I just don’t see a top 6 team with that bunch of WR2 or worse. 8-10 or similar. But not a playoff contender. Not now.
Team 7, The Menaces:
Relishing his anonymity, Mr. Daniel Snyder decided to enter EFS using an alias. Dennis “Menacing” Gazinkus.
But you’re not fooling us anymore, Mr. Snyder.
I mean, who else could have fired his head coach, OFF coach, DEF coach, waterboys, cheerleaders, assistant coaches, players, players’ wives, players’ pets, changed the grass, changed venue, changed stadium……… and still suck???????????????
Mind you, Mr. “Dennis” Snyder changed all of the above not once (2003) but twice (2004). See? Irrefutable proof. That’s what it is called.
So what is it going to be, this year?
Well, it looks a bit better. It looks cleaner. The OFF seems more likely to get it done, though to rely only on 3 OLB, one of which is a long-term health concern seems criminal. I am sure Dennis is hoping for a brilliant UFA pickup!
I think the OFF has also improved, mostly because Collins is now throwing to Moss. That helps. That’s 2 additional Ws per year. Driver also just got upgraded and the WR trio of Driver, Santana Moss and Andre Johnson sounds right.
Overall, this is better than before. Barring the plague of injuries suffered for the past 2 seasons, this team is 10-8, maybe 11-7 and sneaking in the playoffs, especially if it inflicts one of its 3 losses to the Canucks.
Team 8, TJ Chongos:
Jon had picked up the proverbial “worst orphan in EFS” – we all hear that story every year. Though in his case, it might have been one of the worst indeed.
The clean up has been done. Enough of it?
Not yet… It’s coming around and the DEF bears the mark of improvement. But depth, age, past losers, injuries are still a concern. Ditto for the very young, high potential OFF.
I mean, Eli Manning, Roethlisberger, tons of young WR1s.
I don’t think this is a 2005 contender, but Jon always draft well and barring PC issues, would have had a much, much better RFA. So couple draft and RFA, I think 2006, 2007 will be nicer.
2005? 7-11, maybe a touch more.
Team 9, Iron Workers:
This team is also an orphan in shambles, a perennial loser. So it’s going to be a long year!
Age and durability are huge concerns. Lack of receivers too. Overall, there is much work to be done on this team before it’s fun again. The 2005 draft was a good start, but only a start. In the meantime, 7-11 seems like a lot.
Team 10, Muckers:
Another perennial loser, royally f*****d up by the stupid Washington bunch. These guys were trouble since the 2003 draft and we ought to thank owners picking their teams up.
Yet, this team’s DEF strikes me as one of the most improved.
Its OL can be big and yummy. Bulger and Brady? Not too shabby. Clinton Portis? Rebounding.
Darrell Jackson and Hines Ward: 2 out of 4 needed receivers is better than its competition.
So, clearly, this is an improved team and efficient management. The lack of receivers will once again be a tough obstacle to overcome in 2005, but if the management stays equally smart throughout RFA and draft 2006, this team will be a contender. 10-8.
Team 11, Jokers II:
Actually one of the better teams from the Washington bunch, it was in the 2003 playoffs.
But if age was its biggest knock 2 years ago – and no youth was added by the old mgmt. – age is an even bigger concern in 2005… Sapp, Rice, Taylor, Zach Thomas, Junior Seau, Bruschi, Derricks Brooks: it’s easy to understand the 2003 playoffs, but hard to believe in the future. The secondary is also alarmingly empty. The OL pedestrian at best. The OFF? Aging!!
What gives? From 11-7 to 10-8 to 8-10. Saved by its offense and occasional elderly geritrol fire and bursts, like Taylor’s last week.
Team 12, Road Rage 1002:
Guess what? Another newcomer!!
But again, Gary got the better end of the shambles, just like Jokers II, inheriting an 11-7 team twice in a row.
Gary traded everything, even his 18-wheeler to Swampies!!
Will those trades pay off? Not sure, but the backbone is solid – though OLBs are extremely weak.
The OL is YUM-MY. Chiefs, Raiders, Chiefs, Raiders, Chiefs, Jets, Raiders, Chiefs… you get the picture!
Overall, this team is clearly the most balanced of its Div. and has a good shot at repeating 11-7.
Team 13, Raiderninerfan:
A California boy, eh? 4 words for you, CA boy: welcome to Swampies’ Swamp.
That’s right. You can collect the crumbs.
I actually like the work put in this team, though the OBs – again – are concerning. Nice OL, good OFF, decent receivers, solid RB… I don’t see why this team would repeat its 6-12 record… I would think 9-9 is more in order. Maybe better.
Team 14, Raven Maniacs 1002:
A Ravens fan, eh? 4 words for you, BAL boy: welcome to Swampies’ Swamp.
That’s right… You too can collect the crumbs!!
Joke aside, the original team was a very solid work from Bryon Brand. Solid and 12-6 in its first year. But then, what a slide… 3-15???????? What happened?
No idea, although mgmt went MIA.
Can this franchise be revived or is it condemned to last place for 2005?
No DEF, no OL, Brett Favre old and without Walker, Palmer not a stud just yet, boy: you do need help!!! And fast. In the meantime, bathing with the Troll, it’s going to be 5-13.
Team 15, Lugheads:
So, a timber man? Guess what, I have 4 words for you too: Welcome to Swampies’ Swamp.
You get the picture.
I actually think that Raiderniner and Lugheads can take a few wins away from Swampies, maybe 1 each, with the usual luck and all. Otherwise, it’s going to be a long 10-8 season.
Team 16, Swamp “Swampies” Dwellers:
Aka. The Trolls, or Swampies.
The team to beat in 2005. Simple as that.
I am on it this coming week.
But keep a couple of stats in mind: it scored 459 ppg in 2003 and 485 in 2004…
The worst part? It’s improved since then. So last week’s 388 could be its lowest score of the year. As a matter of fact, with optimal selection, he would have scored 551 points.
551.
551.
551.
I am not afraid. I am shaking.
I mean, have you seen this DL? Abraham, Peppers, Mathis, Suggs, Will Smith, Dewayne White, Henderson? Sick.
Urlacher, Morgan, Vilma? Sick.
The entire Eagles OL. Sick.
Manning throwing to LT and Gates? Sick.
Moss, Chad Johnson, Fitzgerald, Boldin, Roy Williams? Sick.
I hate this troll!!!!!!
OK. That’s it for the preview.
Go kill some trolls and enjoy the football year.
Next up is from Paris… France, not KY or TX.
Cheers!
-Globetrotting Blue.
Well, fellow league members, I am back for the 3rd yearly edition of a weekly column… that will probably not remain weekly too long, because my schedule is just too loaded, but at least I am always starting with the best intentions in the Fantasy World.
This league is kicking its 3rd championship season, but with a total of 50% new owners over the first 2 seasons, only few long term rivalries have been able to develop.
I guess my #1 message is to wish everybody a wonderful season, fun and enjoyable.
However, my true wish is that most of you will decide to stick around for a lot longer than your previous owners and that we will really be able to enjoy a solid, long-term group.
Talking about rivalries… We have a nice one coming this week: the wannabe champs but ever-dwelling in the swamps, the green trolls of EFS 1002, the murkiest trader Fantasy has ever known: “the Swamp Dwellers” vs. your revered, all-mighty yet incredibly humble, the ever pleased with themselves (not playing with themselves), the 2004 World Champions (well, 1002 World Champions): “The Aquablues”.
Yep, week 2 and it’s already Him vs. Me.
I see that during the offseason, He has managed to con all the newbies into trading their best players for mirages of good players; He has managed to con all the newbies into getting Him out of Cap Hell. His greed knows no limit. He wants a 1002 title, then another one, then again. He will trade his mother for such a prize. So is the “Swamp Master”.
Luckily for all of you, Crazy Canucks fended him off in 2003… then yours truly, the Aquablues, playing with themselves, fended him off again. And again.
How is the pain, Mr. Swamp? I mean, a spanking during the regular season and then during playoffs.
Enough taunting.
The team to beat in 2005 clearly is the Swamps… Already a powerhouse, always drafting well, always trading extremely well, this is a beauty of team and my nightmare. A 2004 485 ppg nightmare……………
Enough taunting, I said.
Well, not quite… We can change victim, can’t we?
How about a small taunt towards Mr. Crazy “Teflon” Canuck?
I mean, I have been predicting his doom and fall and misery since week 1, season 1… What gave? The 2003 title.
Then, in 2004, I wrote: this time, he’s crumbling. He’s imploding. He will be miserable. What gave? 16-2 season (though yours truly took great, great pride in being responsible of 50% of those losses… To me, back then, it was as pleasurable as winning the title).
So what about 2005? Can Crazy “Teflon” Canuck pull another one?
Surely not would be my normal answer but I am sick of taking beatings on my predictions… so yes, I am guessing the Crazy Canucks will crumble into oblivion – but surely not…….. !!!!!!!!!!
Anyway… That’s how things shape up.
How about a quick hit on each team? Ready?
Team 1, Grandstand:
I never saw any real knock on this solid, young team – aside from drafting Charles Rogers!!
No, wait, this was a cheap shot: the kid has finally managed to play 1 game!!! And score? Yes, 5 whole points. How’s that for performance?
Otherwise, Grandstand team is solid and probably better than last year. 10-8 seems in order.
Team 2, No Fear:
An another Aussie in my league… I seem to be collecting them!! As a matter of fact, if I recall correctly, we originally had an Aussie in the league, back in 2003? Anyway.
This team had a very solid 2004 season, so can it repeat?
The DEF is under whelming and the secondary needs life support.
There is life in the OFF, but counting on the Drews to win the big one? I am not sure that’s possible. 10-8 would be nice.
Team 3, Aquablues:
Let’s cut the crap: I won many games last year thanks to Reuben Droughns playing (well) alongside Corey Dillon (playing well). So can I repeat? Considering I never thought I could win it in the first place?
I had to make serious cuts in the offseason for mildly aging players. I like my 3-4 as much as anybody’s – save Swampies, of course. My OL is yummy if Manning and Culpepper can dotheir magic. I have a huge issue at RB and it has plagued me since 2003… Bush will be mine in 2006!!!
So what gives? The team is slightly improved (in my loving eyes) over 2004 but not enough to be more than 12-6 – just like last year. Especially without Droughns.
Team 4, Darkspire Highlanders:
Talk about a rough transition… From playoffs and 10-8 to 5-13 and 15th in the league. Ouch.
The OFF juice is here to bring the form back, but the DEF mojo is lacking: I like the OB, but there is no ILBs on this team. So it’s reduced to playing a 4-3 and that DL is iffy at best.
Overall, it seems that real life has taken a huge toll on Ian’s Fantasy management and his DEF needs repair and good UFA work. Otherwise, it’s going to be a long, painful season. A 6-12 season – thanks to that OFF and OLBs.
Team 5, Crazy “Teflon” Canucks:
What can I say? It’s old, it’s bald, it’s supposed to lose, it’s doomed and it’s 16-2…
Joke aside, the DL is a blue collar dream. Opposed in style to the flashy names recruited by Swampies, Canucks went for less profile but hard work nonetheless. Who would have thought Pat Williams would score like Freeney??
The LB corps completes an aging DEF but one made of studs. This 4-3 or 3-4 has carried many wins. The OFF is very impressive, too.
Yes, you understand well: I am now converted. I am a believer. I think the Canucks are for real. 15-3 real.
I just hope this change of appreciation will jinx them forever and ever!!!!
Team 6, Reading Redskins:
This team was one of last year’s most improved… From 5-13 and last to middle of the pack, its only issue is to face the Canucks twice a year! Still, the work put in there has to be appreciated and the improvement was noticeable. So what’s in store?
It has a decent DEF – LeMar Marshall could have been the steal of the year at ILB – though the OB corps is on the weak side of weakness.
But really, deep down, the biggest knock on this team is its receiving corps. Or lack of.
I just don’t see a top 6 team with that bunch of WR2 or worse. 8-10 or similar. But not a playoff contender. Not now.
Team 7, The Menaces:
Relishing his anonymity, Mr. Daniel Snyder decided to enter EFS using an alias. Dennis “Menacing” Gazinkus.
But you’re not fooling us anymore, Mr. Snyder.
I mean, who else could have fired his head coach, OFF coach, DEF coach, waterboys, cheerleaders, assistant coaches, players, players’ wives, players’ pets, changed the grass, changed venue, changed stadium……… and still suck???????????????
Mind you, Mr. “Dennis” Snyder changed all of the above not once (2003) but twice (2004). See? Irrefutable proof. That’s what it is called.
So what is it going to be, this year?
Well, it looks a bit better. It looks cleaner. The OFF seems more likely to get it done, though to rely only on 3 OLB, one of which is a long-term health concern seems criminal. I am sure Dennis is hoping for a brilliant UFA pickup!
I think the OFF has also improved, mostly because Collins is now throwing to Moss. That helps. That’s 2 additional Ws per year. Driver also just got upgraded and the WR trio of Driver, Santana Moss and Andre Johnson sounds right.
Overall, this is better than before. Barring the plague of injuries suffered for the past 2 seasons, this team is 10-8, maybe 11-7 and sneaking in the playoffs, especially if it inflicts one of its 3 losses to the Canucks.
Team 8, TJ Chongos:
Jon had picked up the proverbial “worst orphan in EFS” – we all hear that story every year. Though in his case, it might have been one of the worst indeed.
The clean up has been done. Enough of it?
Not yet… It’s coming around and the DEF bears the mark of improvement. But depth, age, past losers, injuries are still a concern. Ditto for the very young, high potential OFF.
I mean, Eli Manning, Roethlisberger, tons of young WR1s.
I don’t think this is a 2005 contender, but Jon always draft well and barring PC issues, would have had a much, much better RFA. So couple draft and RFA, I think 2006, 2007 will be nicer.
2005? 7-11, maybe a touch more.
Team 9, Iron Workers:
This team is also an orphan in shambles, a perennial loser. So it’s going to be a long year!
Age and durability are huge concerns. Lack of receivers too. Overall, there is much work to be done on this team before it’s fun again. The 2005 draft was a good start, but only a start. In the meantime, 7-11 seems like a lot.
Team 10, Muckers:
Another perennial loser, royally f*****d up by the stupid Washington bunch. These guys were trouble since the 2003 draft and we ought to thank owners picking their teams up.
Yet, this team’s DEF strikes me as one of the most improved.
Its OL can be big and yummy. Bulger and Brady? Not too shabby. Clinton Portis? Rebounding.
Darrell Jackson and Hines Ward: 2 out of 4 needed receivers is better than its competition.
So, clearly, this is an improved team and efficient management. The lack of receivers will once again be a tough obstacle to overcome in 2005, but if the management stays equally smart throughout RFA and draft 2006, this team will be a contender. 10-8.
Team 11, Jokers II:
Actually one of the better teams from the Washington bunch, it was in the 2003 playoffs.
But if age was its biggest knock 2 years ago – and no youth was added by the old mgmt. – age is an even bigger concern in 2005… Sapp, Rice, Taylor, Zach Thomas, Junior Seau, Bruschi, Derricks Brooks: it’s easy to understand the 2003 playoffs, but hard to believe in the future. The secondary is also alarmingly empty. The OL pedestrian at best. The OFF? Aging!!
What gives? From 11-7 to 10-8 to 8-10. Saved by its offense and occasional elderly geritrol fire and bursts, like Taylor’s last week.
Team 12, Road Rage 1002:
Guess what? Another newcomer!!
But again, Gary got the better end of the shambles, just like Jokers II, inheriting an 11-7 team twice in a row.
Gary traded everything, even his 18-wheeler to Swampies!!
Will those trades pay off? Not sure, but the backbone is solid – though OLBs are extremely weak.
The OL is YUM-MY. Chiefs, Raiders, Chiefs, Raiders, Chiefs, Jets, Raiders, Chiefs… you get the picture!
Overall, this team is clearly the most balanced of its Div. and has a good shot at repeating 11-7.
Team 13, Raiderninerfan:
A California boy, eh? 4 words for you, CA boy: welcome to Swampies’ Swamp.
That’s right. You can collect the crumbs.
I actually like the work put in this team, though the OBs – again – are concerning. Nice OL, good OFF, decent receivers, solid RB… I don’t see why this team would repeat its 6-12 record… I would think 9-9 is more in order. Maybe better.
Team 14, Raven Maniacs 1002:
A Ravens fan, eh? 4 words for you, BAL boy: welcome to Swampies’ Swamp.
That’s right… You too can collect the crumbs!!
Joke aside, the original team was a very solid work from Bryon Brand. Solid and 12-6 in its first year. But then, what a slide… 3-15???????? What happened?
No idea, although mgmt went MIA.
Can this franchise be revived or is it condemned to last place for 2005?
No DEF, no OL, Brett Favre old and without Walker, Palmer not a stud just yet, boy: you do need help!!! And fast. In the meantime, bathing with the Troll, it’s going to be 5-13.
Team 15, Lugheads:
So, a timber man? Guess what, I have 4 words for you too: Welcome to Swampies’ Swamp.
You get the picture.
I actually think that Raiderniner and Lugheads can take a few wins away from Swampies, maybe 1 each, with the usual luck and all. Otherwise, it’s going to be a long 10-8 season.
Team 16, Swamp “Swampies” Dwellers:
Aka. The Trolls, or Swampies.
The team to beat in 2005. Simple as that.
I am on it this coming week.
But keep a couple of stats in mind: it scored 459 ppg in 2003 and 485 in 2004…
The worst part? It’s improved since then. So last week’s 388 could be its lowest score of the year. As a matter of fact, with optimal selection, he would have scored 551 points.
551.
551.
551.
I am not afraid. I am shaking.
I mean, have you seen this DL? Abraham, Peppers, Mathis, Suggs, Will Smith, Dewayne White, Henderson? Sick.
Urlacher, Morgan, Vilma? Sick.
The entire Eagles OL. Sick.
Manning throwing to LT and Gates? Sick.
Moss, Chad Johnson, Fitzgerald, Boldin, Roy Williams? Sick.
I hate this troll!!!!!!
OK. That’s it for the preview.
Go kill some trolls and enjoy the football year.
Next up is from Paris… France, not KY or TX.
Cheers!
-Globetrotting Blue.